communication skills conflict resolution Difficult Employees Employee Management management skills workplace conflict

How to Handle Difficult Employees: Common Problems and Solutions

How to Handle Difficult Employees: Common Problems and Solutions

Managing a difficult employee can consume far more time than the original problem deserves. A missed deadline may turn into repeated excuses. A disagreement may become ongoing conflict. An employee who consistently ignores feedback can eventually affect the people around them.

The challenge is that "difficult employee" can describe very different situations. Someone may be struggling because expectations were never clearly communicated. Another employee may have a genuine skills gap. Someone else may be dealing with a workload problem, conflict with a coworker, or frustration with management. In other cases, the behavior is a persistent performance or conduct issue that requires formal intervention.

The mistake is treating all of these situations the same way.

Effective managers focus on observable behavior, determine what is causing it, communicate expectations clearly, and follow up consistently. They also recognize when a problem requires HR involvement or a change in the organization's processes rather than another conversation with the employee.

This guide explains common difficult employee problems, why they happen, how managers can respond, and when training can become part of the solution.

Understanding What Makes an Employee "Difficult"

A difficult employee is not necessarily a bad employee.

An employee who challenges a decision, asks uncomfortable questions, or disagrees with a manager is not automatically creating a workplace problem. Healthy disagreement can improve decisions and expose problems that leadership might otherwise miss.

The concern begins when a pattern of behavior interferes with work, damages working relationships, violates workplace expectations, or prevents the team from functioning effectively.

Common examples include an employee who:

  • Regularly misses deadlines without taking responsibility

  • Responds defensively to reasonable feedback

  • Creates repeated conflict with coworkers

  • Refuses to follow established processes

  • Blames others for problems they helped create

  • Disrupts meetings or team discussions

  • Resists reasonable changes to responsibilities or procedures

  • Communicates in an unnecessarily hostile or disrespectful manner

  • Repeatedly ignores coaching

  • Performs well individually but damages team morale or cooperation

The important distinction is between an isolated incident and a recurring pattern.

A normally reliable employee having one bad day requires a different response from an employee who has demonstrated the same behavior repeatedly despite clear expectations and feedback.

SHRM similarly recommends identifying the specific behavior that makes an employee difficult rather than simply applying the label. A lack of self-awareness, for example, can sometimes be addressed through clear feedback and coaching, while an ongoing pattern that does not improve may require more formal action.

Why Do Difficult Employee Problems Happen?

There is rarely one explanation for difficult workplace behavior.

Managers can make the situation worse by assuming they already know the reason. What looks like laziness may actually be unclear priorities. What looks like insubordination may involve a disagreement about an unrealistic process. What looks like a bad attitude may reflect unresolved conflict or frustration that has never been addressed.

Some common causes include:

Unclear expectations. Employees cannot consistently meet standards that have never been clearly explained. Ambiguous responsibilities can create disputes about who owns a task and what successful performance looks like.

Poor communication. Information may not be reaching the employee, or the manager and employee may interpret the same instructions differently.

Skill or knowledge gaps. An employee may understand what is expected but lack the skills needed to meet the standard.

Workload or resource problems. An employee who is responsible for more work than can reasonably be completed may appear unreliable when the underlying problem is capacity.

Weak management. Inconsistent feedback, favoritism, unclear decisions, or failure to address problems early can allow difficult behavior to become established.

Organizational culture. If employees see poor behavior being tolerated, they may conclude that workplace standards are optional.

Personal conflict. Ongoing friction between employees can produce defensiveness, avoidance, communication breakdowns, and declining cooperation.

Lack of accountability. If missed deadlines, inappropriate conduct, or repeated policy violations have no meaningful consequences, the behavior may continue.

Recent SHRM guidance also emphasizes the importance of role clarity in performance management. When employees do not understand what is expected of them or how their work connects to organizational goals, ambiguity can contribute to stress and weaker performance.

Warning Signs to Watch For

Difficult employee problems rarely appear completely out of nowhere. Managers should pay attention to patterns rather than waiting until the situation becomes a major disruption.

Warning signs can include repeated complaints from coworkers, declining productivity, missed deadlines, increased arguments, communication breakdowns, employees avoiding a particular person, or repeated violations of established procedures.

The meaning behind the warning sign matters.

For example, several employees complaining about the same coworker could indicate a genuine behavioral problem. But it could also reveal a team conflict that involves multiple people. Similarly, a sudden decline in one employee's performance may warrant a conversation before a manager concludes that the employee has become disengaged.

The goal is not to build a case against someone. It is to understand what is happening accurately enough to respond fairly.

The Business Impact of Difficult Employee Behavior

Unresolved employee problems rarely remain isolated.

A difficult working relationship can consume a manager's time, distract other employees, slow projects, and create frustration across the team. Persistent conflict can also undermine trust and make employees less willing to communicate openly.

SHRM notes that unresolved workplace conflict can contribute to lower morale, damaged trust, reduced productivity, absenteeism, and, in more serious circumstances, legal disputes.

The manager's role is particularly important because management behavior has a substantial effect on the employee experience. Gallup's research continues to find that managers account for at least 70% of the variance in team-level employee engagement.

That does not mean managers are responsible for every employee problem. It does mean that ignoring a problem, communicating inconsistently, or allowing one employee's behavior to continue unchecked can make the situation worse.

How to Handle a Difficult Employee

There is no single conversation that will fix every difficult employee problem. A more reliable approach is to work through the situation systematically.

Step 1: Identify the specific behavior

Avoid labels such as "negative," "lazy," or "difficult" when discussing the issue internally or with the employee.

Instead, identify what the person is actually doing.

For example:

"Three project deadlines were missed during the last month, and the team was not informed until the deadlines had passed."

That is much more useful than:

"You're not committed to the team."

Specific observations give both sides something concrete to discuss.

Step 2: Determine what is causing the behavior

Before deciding on a solution, ask questions.

Does the employee understand the expectation? Do they have the necessary skills and resources? Is there a conflict with another employee? Has the workload changed? Has the manager provided adequate direction?

This does not mean excusing poor behavior. It means making sure the response addresses the actual problem.

Step 3: Have a direct conversation

Do not allow a manageable problem to become a major one simply because the manager is uncomfortable discussing it.

Explain what you have observed, why it matters, and what needs to change.

A useful structure is:

"I've noticed [specific behavior]. It is affecting [team, customer, project, or business outcome]. Going forward, I need [specific expectation]. Let's talk about what is preventing that from happening."

The conversation should be professional rather than personal.

Step 4: Listen before making assumptions

Give the employee an opportunity to explain their perspective.

There may be information the manager does not have. The employee might identify a process problem, conflicting instructions, resource shortage, or misunderstanding that needs to be addressed.

Listening does not mean agreeing with everything the employee says. It means gathering enough information to make a fair decision.

Step 5: Clarify expectations

Be specific about what needs to change.

"Communicate better" is difficult to measure.

"Notify me at least one business day before a deadline if you believe the deadline cannot be met" is much clearer.

Clear expectations make future coaching and performance discussions more objective.

Step 6: Document important issues

Documentation can help managers maintain an accurate record of significant performance or conduct concerns, conversations, expectations, and follow-up.

Documentation should be factual and consistent with company policy. It should not become a collection of emotional observations or personal judgments.

For serious performance, conduct, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, or other employment issues, managers should follow organizational procedures and involve HR when appropriate.

Step 7: Follow up

One conversation is rarely enough.

Set a reasonable follow-up point and determine whether the behavior has changed. If it has, acknowledge the improvement. If it has not, explain what remains unresolved and determine the next appropriate step.

Consistency is critical. Otherwise, the employee may reasonably conclude that the expectations were temporary.

What Managers Should Do Differently

Managers often make difficult employee situations harder without realizing it.

One common mistake is waiting too long. Small problems are generally easier to address before they become patterns.

Another is making exceptions for a high performer. An employee who produces excellent results but repeatedly mistreats coworkers can still create significant organizational problems.

Managers should also avoid confronting employees emotionally. The objective is not to "win" the conversation. It is to establish what happened, understand the circumstances, communicate expectations, and determine what needs to happen next.

Useful management behaviors include:

  • Address problems early

  • Focus on observable behavior

  • Give specific feedback

  • Listen before reaching conclusions

  • Set measurable expectations

  • Apply policies consistently

  • Avoid favoritism

  • Document significant issues

  • Provide appropriate coaching

  • Follow up on agreed expectations

  • Involve HR or other specialists when necessary

This is also where manager development becomes important. Gallup's current research continues to emphasize the manager's role in creating the conditions that influence engagement, performance, and the employee experience.

What Employees Can Do

Employees also have a role in maintaining productive working relationships, but they should not be expected to solve organizational problems that are outside their control.

An employee dealing with a difficult coworker can communicate concerns professionally, ask for clarification, document important situations, seek appropriate support, and use established escalation channels when necessary.

Employees should not be expected to personally resolve serious allegations involving harassment, discrimination, retaliation, threats, safety violations, or other misconduct. Those situations may require management, HR, compliance, security, or other specialized intervention.

When Training Can Help

Training can be useful when the underlying problem involves a genuine knowledge or skill gap.

For example, a manager who struggles to conduct difficult conversations may benefit from conflict-resolution and communication training. A supervisor who does not know how to provide effective performance feedback may benefit from management training.

Training can help develop skills such as:

  • Difficult conversations

  • Conflict resolution

  • Communication

  • Feedback and coaching

  • Performance management

  • Leadership

  • Workplace professionalism

But training should not be presented as a universal solution.

If the real problem is chronic understaffing, inadequate compensation, unclear organizational structure, serious misconduct, inconsistent leadership, or a broken business process, another course is unlikely to solve the underlying issue.

The best use of training is to strengthen the human skills needed to manage the problem alongside the organizational changes required to address its cause.

Recommended BTM Training

For managers dealing with difficult employee behavior, conflict management and difficult-conversation training is a logical starting point when the challenge involves communication, interpersonal conflict, or handling challenging workplace conversations.

BTM's conflict-management training collection is particularly relevant to managers who need to develop practical skills for addressing workplace disagreements and difficult interactions.

Explore BTM Conflict Management Training & Difficult Conversations →

The training should be viewed as one component of a broader management approach—not as a substitute for clear policies, accountability, HR procedures, or organizational change.

When Training Isn't Enough

Some difficult employee situations require action beyond coaching or professional development.

If an employee repeatedly violates policy after clear expectations and appropriate intervention, the organization may need to use its established performance-management or disciplinary process.

Other circumstances may require:

  • HR involvement

  • Formal investigation

  • Policy changes

  • Process redesign

  • Staffing changes

  • Leadership intervention

  • Safety controls

  • Compliance procedures

  • Organizational restructuring

Serious allegations involving harassment, discrimination, retaliation, threats, violence, or other misconduct should be handled through the organization's appropriate reporting and investigation procedures rather than treated as an ordinary personality conflict.

The goal should always be a fair and proportionate response based on the facts and applicable workplace policies.

How to Prevent Difficult Employee Problems From Returning

Solving one incident does not necessarily solve the conditions that produced it.

Organizations can reduce recurring problems by establishing clear expectations from the beginning, training managers to give useful feedback, creating consistent performance-management practices, and giving employees appropriate ways to raise concerns.

Regular communication is also important. Managers should not wait for an annual review to tell employees that their behavior or performance is creating a problem.

Organizations should periodically evaluate whether the same issues are appearing across teams. If several employees are struggling with the same behavior, the problem may not be an individual employee issue at all. It could indicate unclear policies, weak management practices, insufficient training, or a process that needs to be redesigned.

Key Takeaways

The most effective way to handle a difficult employee is not to focus on the label. Focus on the behavior, its impact, and its underlying cause.

The most important lessons are:

  1. Identify specific behaviors rather than labeling an employee.

  2. Determine whether the problem is caused by skills, expectations, resources, management, culture, or conduct.

  3. Address problems early and communicate expectations clearly.

  4. Use coaching and training when a genuine skill gap exists.

  5. Recognize when the situation requires HR involvement, formal action, or organizational change.

A difficult employee situation is ultimately a management problem to be handled thoughtfully—not a personality contest to be won.

Continue Your Professional Development

Managing difficult employees requires more than knowing what to say in one challenging conversation. Strong managers also need skills in communication, conflict resolution, coaching, accountability, and performance management. Developing those capabilities can help managers address workplace problems earlier and create more consistent expectations for their teams.

Explore Workplace Management & Leadership Articles, Guides and Resources


Related Articles

About the Business Training Media Editorial Team

This article was researched and written by the Business Training Media Editorial Team. We publish expert content covering business strategy, leadership, workplace skills, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, compliance, career development, online learning, professional certifications, business software, and organizational excellence. Our goal is to provide practical, research-backed insights that help professionals, business leaders, and organizations make informed decisions.

More information

Get in touch via the following contact form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.